|
What I thought was "Reverse Swing"... |
A Special Feature by B.V.Swagath
It
was a usual hot sultry day and I was trying my
best to outsmart the batsmen, but with my
limitations in skill and in pace I was getting
smacked almost every ball I bowled. I was trying
my best , but my best was not sufficient enough
to have any impact on the batsmen. Then
suddenly, I just thought why not try to wet (put
sweat and saliva) the ball as I have seen
International players do on TV. I seemed to have
got some extra and rather late movement in the
air. This continued and I gained some new
confidence and most importantly, batsmen were
not taking my bowling lightly anymore !!! I was
keenly observing Javagal Srinath's bowling in
the tests at home , especially the Ahmedabad
Test against South Africa where he had picked up
6 wickets in the 2nd innings . I kept on
experimenting with the ball, changing the sides
of the ball and observing the directions in
which the ball was moving. The more I started to
bowl like this, the more I understood what
"reverse swing" is. I found immediate results by
bowling many a batsmen with the reverse swinging
yorkers, it was so fascinating to watch the ball
swirl in the air .The basic idea about reverse
swing that a bowler has to understand is that
the ball moves in the direction of the shiny
side or the heavier side (wet side), the other
side of the ball being considerably rough. This
is the only thing a bowler has to realize and
not the ball mechanics involved in reverse
swing...
So
as stated above, the ball moves in the direction
of the shine , irrespective of whether the
bowler is gripping the ball for an outswinger or
an inswinger .
Different variations that can be used with
reverse swing (unless stated, the following is
looked at a right arm bowler bowling to a right
handed batsman.
(1) Holding the ball for an
outswinger , with the shiny/wet side on the
right side.
Result:
Ball initially moves out in the air and comes
back into the batsman sharply .
Usually, a batsman can be out leg before as he
tends to play along the wrong line. Even a half
volley with this kind of ball may not be as easy
as it appears for the batsman , with a gate
opening between bat and pad (the batsman
attempting a cover drive) as he tends to play
for the outswinger.
(2) Holding the ball for an inswinger, with
the shiny/wet side on the left side.
Result: Ball initially moves towards the
batsman and at the last moment darts away from
the batsman.
A batsman can be caught behind the wickets and
sometimes bowled. One best way to ball this type
of delivery is to go wide off the crease and
with this angle, a batsman is forced to play the
ball. Outside offstump line may only result in
the batsman being beaten, so the more effective
line would be on offstump, the length should be
around the good length - forcing the batsman to
play a forward defensive shot .
(3) Holding the ball for an outswinger, with
the shiny/wet side on the left side.
Result:
It is very obvious that the ball moves more and
more away from the batsman.
So the line of the delivery should be more on
the middle stump . This kind of delivery results
more in getting the batsman to nick the ball to
the wicket keeper and the slips . It is
important to know that by holding the ball in
this fashion , a bowler cannot afford to pitch
it outside off stump, atleast in limited overs
matches as it would result in a 'wide'.
(4) Holding the ball for an inswinger, with
the shiny/wet side on the right side.
Result: The ball moves in very sharply
almost like a double inswinger/banana inswinger
.
This kind of delivery must be pitched outside
offstump so that the Umpire thinks it would hit
the legstump atleast. Great delivery for the big
inswinging yorkers or the 'toe crunchers' as
they are called. Batsman can be out either by
getting bowled or leg before.
Left
Handers , hmm I always liked bowling round the
wicket to them . You can create more angles for
a left hander than a right hander, thus making
bowling to lefties a lot more fascinating .
There is a myth that reverse swing is only
effective for the real quick bowlers, which
isn't true at all. Best example that comes to my
mind is that of Nathan Astle ,of New Zealand, in
a Test Series in India . Nathan Astle bowled
many overs in that series, the pitches were not
quick but Astle was successful in keeping one
end tight with his millitary medium pace. All he
did was to just keep on persisting with an
offstump line backed up with some good reverse
swing . Of course, the faster you bowl, more are
the chances of a batsman being bowled by those
fast toe crunchers . Medium pacers have a great
chance of getting leg before decisions and
caught behinds if not the 'bowleds' .
Top of the Page
|