|
Solution to an
age-old riddle |
By Syed Ahsan Ali (Link to
1st ODI
Scorecard)
India
has suffered badly due to the absence of a fifth
bowler again in the 1st ODI against England.
When your four top bowlers fail to make an
impression and then the fifth bowler tends to
drop long hops and half volleys more often than
not, then there is nothing much a captain can
do. The fifth bowler either he is one bowler or
comprised of three different bowling options as
it was the case yesterday with the Indians in
the shape of Yuvraj, Sachin and Ganguly, they
are part timers and part timers tend to create
an impact if your other four bowling options
exhibit their expertise with certainty.
Yesterday, the main four Indian bowlers were
honest in their efforts, but nothing penetrative
came from their side that can rattle any
opposition. Obviously, fifth bowling options
which are umpteenth in Indian camp felt the
pinch.
India has to drop this idea of a
weak fifth bowling option. It has been years
that the Indians have been rear guarding this
fruitless idea. There is one simple solution to
this riddle. Which department needs more
bolstering, Indian batting or bowling? I bet
Indian bowling needs more support. So pack your
unit with five bowlers who can do their jobs
shrewdly. Yesterday, fifth bowling options gave
away 79 runs in 13 overs exceeding 6 runs per
over rate. So India needs to bring in someone
like Munaf Patel who can utilize the English
conditions as smartly as any other Indian bowler
can. But at whose cost? There were two mediocre
performances yesterday and one unused or wasted
option in the team. Two mediocrities were
Agarkar and Chawla and a wasted option was
Gambhir.
As India suffered poorly in the bowling
department then I cannot think of dropping any
bowler, but I can think of replacing Chawla with
Powar. So bring in Powar who can add value due
to his batting skills which have not shone so
far but at least he can provide a hope in
desperate situations. Bring in Powar, give time
to Agarkar who is capable of making a comeback
after all his years of experience and
understanding of the game and leave out Gambhir.
I would leave out Gambhir
because when you have experienced openers like
Sachin and Ganguly, then there is no point in
playing three openers one after another. If
Dravid cannot survive the new ball at no.3 being
one of the best no.3 in the game along with
Kallis and Ponting then unfortunately no one can
do it better. Gambhir, the young opener was been
prodigiously wasted yesterday. It was absolute
mind boggling choice of sending him at No.3 when
you have a player of Dravid’s caliber sitting in
the hut waiting for his turn. If you want to
play Gambhir, play him as an opener or don’t
play him at all. There is no point trying him at
different numbers just because you think it can
work it out that way. Everyone cannot be as
versatile as Karthik is.
This composition will make room for six batsmen,
three all-rounders if you are considering
Agarkar and Powar as ones and five specialist
bowlers.
My XI : Sourav Ganguly, Sachin Tendulkar,
Rahul Dravid, Yuvraj Singh, Dinesh Karthik, MS
Dhoni, Ajit Agarkar, Ramesh Powar, Zaheer Khan,
RP Singh, Munaf Patel
Top of the Page |