|
Indian bowling
got to perform much better in the death |
By Syed Ahsan Ali
Bowlers can win you matches definitely as shown
again by the mantra of five specialist bowlers
for India in the Second ODI at Bristol. But the
bowlers had nearly had outdone themselves by
giving away too many runs in the end where
Mascrenhas’s hitting nearly pulling off a
blinder. But it has been two inconsistent
performances from the Indian bowlers in which
they failed to keep a close watch on the scoring
rate. The last 10 overs yielded England nearly
100 runs in their win against England which were
enough to set the cat among the pigeons.
It has been a routine with Indian cricket;
bowlers easily concede too many runs with
frivolity without getting too much attention as
well. Is this becoming a norm or are the Indians
never looking at their bowlers for top-notch
exhibition. Whatever it is? It is scathing to
find the Indian team’s over all standing in
international cricket despite having fine talent
at their disposal. Indian bowling has been lot
better now in comparison with their attacks of
other decades and this is why they are winning
lot more Test matches as well, but One Day
cricket is about taking wickets along with
keeping the scoring rate down in the boundaries
of manageability.
The
new ball bowlers have been gaining reputation
with every new outing, but what about their
reputation of using the old ball during the
death? Ajit Agarkar has been a regular now in
the Indian team with his sterling experience in
the game over the span of years. But he still
finds it hard to keep the ball in the right
areas to prevent any power hitting. Munaf Patel
was instrumental in shaping up victory in the
Second ODI, but when it came to his ability to
complete his spell on a high, he was definitely
below par as compared to his earlier spells.
Youngsters Piyush Chawla and RP Singh were also
all over the place to add to the miseries of
Dravid. By giving away runs with such
carelessness does another thing which is more of
a psychological one than physical. Batsmen all
over the world when they face you in a match
must have done some kind of pre-match homework
about you as an option. And when they see your
economy rate or an average, they start relaxing
in their armchairs with their pads on while
facing you as a bowler. Why? Because they feel
that you can keep the ball on the right spots
for four balls of an over, but your tendency to
slip it away onto the leg stump or drag it up on
a shorter length or pitching too full for rest
of the two deliveries makes you vulnerable. This
mindset tends to undermine your overall stature
as a bowler.
All the great One Day bowlers not only have good
number of wickets against their names but also
healthy economy rates as well. Let’s compare two
excellent bowlers Warne and Stuart MacGill here.
Both have great ability to take wickets. Both
have quite identical strike rates but Stuart
MacGill fails to find too many approvers when it
comes to the comparison with Warne because he
tends to lose his control every now and then.
Whereas Warne built pressure by not only bowling
those lethal variations of his, but also by
bowling maidens after maidens tirelessly. Warne
and MacGill have been compared as far as Test
cricket is concerned, so that clearly can give
you an idea of importance of keeping the run
streaks low in limited over cricket.
Indians have to raise their bar when it comes to
bowl in crunch situations. They have been taking
wickets with the new ball but it is equally
significant to keep the yorkers and the slower
deliveries going with regular intervals in the
last few overs. They have to drop this
run-leaking tendency like a bad habit sooner
than later to be reckoned as a top one-day side.
Top of the Page |