|
Missionaries of Charity ? |
Apr 5, 2006 (From the
Cricket Journal)
Mixing
business with noble intentions is the latest
mantra of the BCCI. As India and Pakistan head
to Abu Dhabi for the two-match DFL Cup, a
greater cause will take center stage. Sport is
often noted to be a wound-healer, and on this
occasion cricket will play the medium and
catalyst to provide relief to those affected by
the Kashmir Earthquake. It is indeed heartening
to know that there is a certain amount of social
responsibility that both the PCB and BCCI are
showing and none better occasion to start off
this endeavour than the Abu-Dhabi tournament.
For once, the age-old mindset of the money going
straight into the Board's kitty has taken a
sidestep and the revenue generated through this
event, should in all likeliness reach the
President's Relief Fund. As per reports, the
overall-revenue from the first ODI could be as
much as 10 million USD and with Percept D'Mark
bidding successfully for the in-stadia rights
for close to 4 million USD, it would seem as if
cricket has finally decided to contribute its
share to a cause. Moreover, the players from
both teams have come forward to donate their
match-fees for the cause.
As the BCCI makes its gradual transformation
from being run as a typical Indian public-sector
unit to a more privatized and corporatized
version, innovation in thought and action is
well on the cards. This renewed mindset could
not have come at a better time for India, as
they seem to do well both on and off the field.
India and Pakistan certainly carry a larger
social responsibility on their shoulders as they
head off to the UAE. They not only make up as
ambassadors of the country they represent, but
also the game they play. The
'giving-back-to-the-society' notion seemed to
have gripped the Indian sub-continent. As the
tsunami waved through the island of Sri Lanka,
it was the cricketers like Muttiah Muralitharan
and Kumar Sangakkara who took it upon themselves
to reach out to the victims and try and heal the
grave wounds of calamity. It is certainly a step
for both the Boards in more ways than one, as
there is no better way to show solidarity for
the cause than cricket.
All this comes with a but, a big
one at that ! For BCCI it might be considered as
a good marketing move to take cricket to
identified "markets", where the game has yet to
leave its imprints. An aggressive step in its
own way, Lalit Modi and the BCCI have outlined
several 'overseas' venues where cricket might
not yet be that popular, and tapping the ethnic
Asian community is crucial to the positioning of
cricket in that country. This is precisely why
India is slated to play about 30 one-dayers
against Pakistan in venues like Kuala Lumpur,
Singapore, Canada, US and the Middle-East in the
next 5 years. Another proposal surrounding this
'overseas' theme is where India play some of
their home matches abroad. I somehow tend to
disagree with this aspect, simply because losing
out on the strong and existing market would hit
the BCCI badly. It is within India itself that
the marketing of the game needs to improve and a
shift in focus from the original statements
could prove a bit harmful at a later stage.
Another thing that concerns me is the official
status of such matches. Maybe the official
status was kept with a larger marketing
perspective in mind, considering that a large
audience would pool in for an India-Pakistan
one-day international than for a
desert-carnival. But will charity or the cause
have any impact on the way the games will be
played ? Its hard to answer it at this stage.
But having accorded official ODI status to these
games, the onus now is upon the teams to
maintain the same levels of intensity and
competitiveness they would had they been playing
in Karachi or Kolkata for that matter. That for
me should define the directions these 'charity'
matches would take in the future.
I am glad that there is finally
a recognition of a larger responsibility by the
BCCI to its fans and the society in general,
unlike the past, where elections defined
responsibility. Such events must be encouraged
in the near future and provide that one chance
for our cricketers to understand the larger
human interest. To conclude, one hopes that two
spirited games of cricket is all that the
Kashmir quake victims deserve to bring a smile
on their faces. We also hope that the 22 men on
the field, in blue and green do enough to try
and undo the mental scars of this intense
calamity.
Top of the Page |